Expanding the Genetic Code to Create Impossible Proteins

Nature’s genetic code uses 20 standard amino acids to build all proteins. Tiragena’s proprietary technology expands this code, enabling us to incorporate non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs) with novel properties—creating therapeutic proteins impossible to achieve in nature.

Genetic Code Expansion (GCE): Rewriting Biology’s Rules

The foundation

Every protein in your body is built from just 20 amino acids, dictated by the universal genetic code. These building blocks have served life for billions of years—but they have limitations. They can be oxidized, they can aggregate, they can fail under stress. Tiragena’s proprietary GCE platform breaks these limitations.

How it works

Our orthogonal translation system (OTS) introduces additional genetic “codes” that cells can use to incorporate non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs)—building blocks with properties nature never evolved:

Key components

  1. Engineered tRNA–synthetase pairs: Orthogonal systems that don’t interfere with natural cellular machinery.
  2. Non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs): Over 50 validated ncAAs in our library, each with unique properties.
  3. Precision site selection: Computational tools to identify optimal modification sites.
  4. Genetic firewall: Biosafety measures ensuring controlled production.

Delivery platforms

VLP/LNP technology: Getting proteins where they’re needed

Virus-like particles (VLPs)

Our engineered VLPs package all necessary machinery for in vivo protein modification:

Capabilities:

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs)

Leveraging mRNA delivery technology validated by COVID-19 vaccines:

Targeting strategies:

Breakthrough innovation: TNA-templated RNA patching

Traditional RNA editing (ADAR-based) can only create UAG codons at existing CAG (glutamine) sites. Most disease-critical sites lack these codons—making them inaccessible. Threose nucleic acid (TNA) serves as a bio-orthogonal scaffold that resists degradation (immune to cellular RNases), evades RNase H (won’t destroy target mRNA), enables precise ligation (inserts UAG codons anywhere), and allows unrestricted ncAA incorporation at any disease-relevant position.

Mechanism: (1) Cas13 locates target mRNA (RADARS-gated for cell specificity). (2) TNA splint hybridizes to mRNA site. (3) MS2-recruited ligase stitches in UAG codon. (4) Orthogonal ribosome incorporates ncAA. (5) Modified protein resists aggregation/oxidation.

Three mechanisms of protein protection

1. Aggregation prevention. Proteins like tau, α-synuclein, and SOD1 misfold and clump together, forming toxic aggregates that kill neurons. Strategic ncAA placement at aggregation interfaces uses bulky aromatic ncAAs (steric clashes blocking β-sheet formation), charged ncAAs (disrupt hydrophobic interactions), and cross-linking ncAAs (stabilize native conformations). Example: Tau PHF6 motifs (residues 275–280, 306–311)—aggregation-blocking ncAAs at these positions.

2. Oxidative damage resistance. ROS modify proteins—nitrating tyrosines, oxidizing cysteines—triggering misfolding. Replace vulnerable residues with oxidation-resistant ncAAs (e.g., meta-fluorotyrosine; selenocysteine analogs; photo-stable tyrosine variants). Example: α-synuclein—three critical tyrosines (Tyr39, Tyr125, Tyr133); nitration accelerates Parkinson’s progression; replace with nitration-proof analogs.

3. Structural stabilization. Age-related protein instability leads to loss of function and toxic conformations. Conformationally rigid ncAAs lock proteins into functional states—proline analogs, fluorinated amino acids for core packing, metal-chelating ncAAs for active sites. Example: Mutant SOD1 in ALS—metal-chelating ncAAs to restore stability and prevent aggregation.

Safety & advantages: why protein editing is superior to gene editing

Transient, not permanent: mRNA-based delivery (naturally degrades); no genomic integration; fully reversible; stop treatment if needed.

Dose-controllable: Adjust frequency based on response; titratable therapeutic effect; flexible administration schedules.

Reduced off-target risk: No DNA cutting; no permanent mutations; RADARS gating ensures cell-specific activity.

Regulatory precedent: mRNA therapeutics validated (COVID vaccines); established manufacturing pathways; known safety profile.

Validated science

Built on decades of research

Key publications

Our scientific foundation includes peer-reviewed work across genetic code expansion, non-canonical amino acid incorporation, and translational protein engineering. A curated publications list is maintained for partners and due-diligence review.

Collaborations

We actively collaborate with academic laboratories, clinical experts, and industry development partners to accelerate target validation, delivery optimization, and translational readiness.

How we compare at a glance

Illustrative comparison of protein-level editing versus permanent genomic change—not a claim of superiority for every patient in every setting.

Protein editing (Tiragena) vs. in vivo gene therapy (typical patterns)

Dimension Tiragena protein editing In vivo gene therapy (typical) Biologics Small molecules
Permanent DNA change
No genomic integration
Often permanent transgene integration
No (typically)
No
Reversible / stoppable
mRNA degrades; stop treatment if needed
Difficult to reverse
Clearance-based
Typically yes
Off-target DNA risk
No DNA cutting
Insertional risk varies by vector
Not applicable
Polypharmacology common
Regulatory precedent
mRNA/LNP pathways
Gene therapy frameworks
Established for mAbs
Established

Pipeline and programs: